Current:Home > NewsTexas jury deciding if student’s parents are liable in a deadly 2018 school shooting -MoneyBase
Texas jury deciding if student’s parents are liable in a deadly 2018 school shooting
View
Date:2025-04-16 19:17:21
GALVESTON, Texas (AP) — Jurors in Texas resumed deliberating Monday on whether the parents of a Texas student accused of killing 10 people in a 2018 school shooting near Houston should be held accountable.
The victims’ lawsuit seeks to hold Dimitrios Pagourtzis and his parents, Antonios Pagourtzis and Rose Marie Kosmetatos, financially liable for the shooting at Santa Fe High School on May 18, 2018. They are pursuing at least $1 million in damages.
Victims’ attorneys say the parents failed to provide necessary support for their son’s mental health and didn’t do enough to prevent him from accessing their guns.
“It was their son, under their roof, with their guns who went and committed this mass shooting,” Clint McGuire, representing some of the victims, told jurors during closing statements in the civil trial Friday in Galveston.
Authorities say Pagourtzis fatally shot eight students and two teachers. He was 17 at the time.
Pagourtzis, now 23, has been charged with capital murder, but the criminal case has been on hold since November 2019, when he was declared incompetent to stand trial. He is being held at a state mental health facility.
Lori Laird, an attorney for Pagourtzis’ parents, said their son’s mental break wasn’t foreseeable and that he hid his plans for the shooting from them. She also said the parents kept their firearms locked up.
“The parents didn’t pull the trigger, the parents didn’t give him a gun,” Laird said.
In April, Jennifer and James Crumbley were sentenced to at least 10 years in prison by a Michigan judge after becoming the first parents convicted in a U.S. mass school shooting. Pagourtzis’ parents are not accused of any crime.
The lawsuit was filed by relatives of seven of the people killed and four of the 13 who were wounded in the Santa Fe attack. Attorneys representing some of the survivors talked about the trauma they still endure.
veryGood! (1388)
Related
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Can Iceberg Surges in the Arctic Trigger Rapid Warming at the Other End of The World?
- Ohio Environmentalists, Oil Companies Battle State Over Dumping of Fracking Wastewater
- North Texas Suburb Approves New Fracking Zone Near Homes and Schools
- Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
- As Water Levels Drop, the Risk of Arsenic Rises
- Climate Change Wiped Out Thousands of the West’s Most Iconic Cactus. Can Planting More Help a Species that Takes a Century to Mature?
- invisaWear Smart Jewelry and Accessories Are Making Safety Devices Stylish
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- Princess Charlotte Makes Adorable Wimbledon Debut as She Joins Prince George and Parents in Royal Box
Ranking
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- Shell Refinery Unit Had History of Malfunctions Before Fire
- CBS New York Meteorologist Elise Finch Dead at 51
- Love is Blind's Lauren Speed-Hamilton Reveals If She and Husband Cameron Would Ever Return To TV
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Red States Stand to Benefit From a ‘Layer Cake’ of Tax Breaks From Inflation Reduction Act
- More Than a Decade of Megadrought Brought a Summer of Megafires to Chile
- Megan Fox's Bikini Photo Shoot on a Tree Gets Machine Gun Kelly All Fired Up
Recommendation
Could your smelly farts help science?
Environmentalists Want the FTC Green Guides to Slam the Door on the ‘Chemical’ Recycling of Plastic Waste
A Guardian of Federal Lands, Lambasted by Left and Right
EPA Proposes to Expand its Regulations on Dumps of Toxic Waste From Burning Coal
'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
Virtual Power Plants Are Coming to Save the Grid, Sooner Than You Might Think
Aruba Considers Enshrining the ‘Rights of Nature’ in Its Constitution
Supreme Court Sharply Limits the EPA’s Ability to Protect Wetlands